Printer friendly
"AcronymAttic.com

What does RPEC stand for?

RPEC stands for rat peritoneal exudate cells

Advertisement:

This definition appears rarely

See other definitions of RPEC

Other Resources: Acronym Finder has 7 verified definitions for RPEC

Samples in periodicals archive:

Figure 5. Effect of CD11b+cell populations on T cell proliferation in vitro. A. Indicated numbers of CD11b+ cells sorted from the peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) of normal control or EL-4 carrying C57BL/6 mice were co-cultured for 3 days with splenic CD4+ T cells and CD11c+ cells and proliferation induced with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies. T cell proliferation was determined as described in Materials and Methods.
The odds are against its survival. To answer your specific questions… 1) I don’t think adding FBS above 10% is helpful and any excess above that may cause problems later when you try and drop the concentration down to 10% for growth at a higher cell density. Incidentally, I suggest moving away from serum altogether for many reasons including purification of the MAb from the growth medium. There are a lot of great serum-free and even protein-free hybridoma media out there such as CD-Hybridoma or Hybridoma SFM. 2) PEC-feeder cells are peritoneal exudate feeder cells.
The genes that encode IL-17A and IL-17F are located on chromosome 6. IL-17E (or IL-25) shows the lowest similarity to IL-17A in terms of the amino acid sequence and also promotes Th2 cell-mediated immune responses, thereby contributing to allergic disease and defense against helminthic parasites [10, 15]. IL-17C is produced in epithelial cells and keratinocytes in response to pathogens or inflammatory cytokines and also promotes IL-17 production. Moreover, IL-17C induced TNFα and IL-1β production in the human monocytic cell line THP1 and mouse peritoneal exudate cells.
Ceana H. Nezhat, MD, Vadim V. Morozov, MD, Daniel S. Seidman, MD INTRODUCTION Peritoneal adhesions following pelvic and abdominal surgery are a frequent cause of intestinal obstruction, reduced fertility, and pelvic pain. In gynecology, adhesion formation at the vaginal cuff and pelvic sidewall frequently involves bowel, omentum, and adnexa. This may result in pelvic pain, dyspareunia, small bowel obstruction, and residual ovary syndrome when salpingo-oophorectomy is not performed. Adhesions were identified as the primary cause of chronic pelvic pain in 13-26% of females. In many surveys of postoperative bowel obstruction, abdominal surgery was found to be the leading cause of adhesion formation. Intra-abdominal adhesions between the previous abdominal scar and the underlying viscera are a common consequence of laparotomy. Patients undergoing laparoscopy after a previous laparotomy should be considered at risk for the presence of adhesions between the old scar and the underlying viscous, such as bowel or omentum. It has been reported that after laparotomy, 68-82% of patients will have intra-abdominal adhesions. Patients with midline abdominal incisions had more adhesions (59%) than did those with Pfannenstiel incisions (27%). Patients with midline incisions done for gynecologic indications had more adhesions (42%) than did patients with any abdominal incisions performed for obstetric indications (22%). The type of incision did not affect the presence of adhesions in patients with previous obstetric operations. Adhesions to the bowel were more common after midline incisions above the umbilicus. Twenty-one women had direct injury to adherent omentum and bowel during the laparoscopic procedure. Even more important for laparoscopic surgery is the presence of peri-umbilical adhesions. In most cases, the umbilicus remains the primary site of entry for a variety of laparoscopic procedures. Table 1 demonstrates the incidence of peri-umbilical adhesions following various surgical interventions. Peritoneal adhesions are thought to cause pelvic pain by indirectly inhibiting the motion of involved organs, thereby stretching the smooth muscle of adjacent viscera or the abdominal wall. Sulaiman et al., examined adhesions found in women undergoing laparotomy, most of whom had chronic pelvic pain. Analysis revealed that all adhesions studied had sensory nerve fibers although the location of the adhesion, its size, and its estimated age did not influence the type of nerve fibers found. A recent prospective blinded randomized multicenter trial compared laparoscopic adhesiolysis to diagnostic laparoscopy for the relief of chronic pelvic pain attributed to adhesions. Both groups exhibited significant improvement in their pain and quality of life but there were no differences found between the two groups. This finding in the diagnostic laparoscopy group could be attributed to a possible placebo effect or to the fact that many women were reassured that they had no serious pelvic pathology. In spite of these results, adhesiolysis for pelvic pain should still be considered in cases where dense adhesions between organ systems exist or for situations such as ovarian remnant syndrome. The effect of adhesions on fertility is unquestioned. Caspi and associates reported an inverse relation between the severity of pelvic adhesions and pregnancy rates. After adhesiolysis, pregnancy rates varied according to the extent of adnexal damage and, to a lesser degree, the severity of the adhesions. It has been repeatedly shown that both extent and severity of adhesions are significantly reduced by laparoscopic adhesiolysis. However, the initial extent and severity of adhesions do not predict recurrence. The involved organ, adnexa being most frequent, was shown to be the only predictive factor. Since the development of postoperative adhesions is a major factor in deciding the outcome of fertility-promoting operative procedures, gynecologists should understand the mechanism of their formation, use optimal techniques for adhesiolysis, and apply agents or devices to reduce their development. ADHESION FORMATION Adhesions form when there is damage to the visceral or parietal peritoneum, and the basement membrane of the mesothelial layer is exposed to the surroundings. Causes of peritoneal injury include irritation and damage from infection, ischemia, mechanical trauma, or exposure to various chemicals. This injury induces an inflammatory reaction whereby mast cell breakdown occurs, vascular permeability increases, and a fibrinous exudate is produced. This exudate is then transformed into a fibrin matrix covered with mesenchymal cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages, and enables tissue repair to occur. Although this fibrin matrix is essential for the healing process of normal peritoneum, its dissolution is also necessary so that adhesion formation does not occur. This dissolution is mediated by the fibrinolytic pathway where plasminogen is converted to its active form, plasmin, which then degrades fibrin. Normal fibrinolytic activity usually prevents fibrinous attachments for 72 to 96 hours after surgery. Mesothelial repair occurs within 5 days of trauma and this process of peritoneal healing differs from that of skin as observed by Hertzler. When a peritoneal defect is made, repair is not initiated at the borders of the defect, but rather, the entire surface becomes epithelialized spontaneously. This phenomenon allows small defects to heal as quickly as larger ones. Figure 1. When the fibrinolytic activity of the peritoneum is suppressed, fibrinous adhesions are formed and persist, as collagen deposition and neovascularization occur. The factors that suppress fibrinolytic activity and promote formation of postoperative adhesions are listed in Table 2. Prevention of fibrinolytic suppression can be achieved to a certain extent with microsurgical principles and techniques. The use of magnification, proper handling of tissues, constant irrigation, meticulous hemostasis, and the use of microsurgical instruments and fine nonreactive sutures are of utmost importance. Peritoneal reapproximation, which was previously advocated, is now no longer recommended. After peritoneal tissue is resected, natural healing is associated with less adhesion formation than occurs after reapproximation with staples or sutures, as demonstrated by McDonald in a rabbit model. In the past, fertility-promoting operations done by laparotomy were often followed by reformation of adhesions and the development of new adhesions even when proper microsurgical techniques were employed. Reformation of adhesions is found at 37 to 72% of operative sites, and 51% of patients develop new adhesions after reproductive procedures by laparotomy. Several animal and clinical studies compared the formation of postoperative adhesions after fertility-promoting operations by laparoscopy and laparotomy. With...
In a murine model it has been shown that the antitumor activity of carboxyethylgermanium sesquioxide (Ge-132) can be depleted by administration of macrophage (M phi) blockers. In the present study, the role that M phi play in the antitumor activity of the compound was investigated. Oral administration of Ge-132 in mice was demonstrated to be effective in activating M phi (Ge-132-cytotoxic M phi), and the cytotoxic activity of these M phi appeared in the peritoneal cavity of mice 48 hours after the oral administration of the compound. Co-cultivation of RL male-1 leukemia or Ehrlich carcinoma cells with Ge-132-cytotoxic M phi in vitro resulted in marked suppression of the growth of tumor cells. The transfer of peritoneal exudate cells.